Click here to read introductory remarks and feedback from the Executive Committee of SAC

 

1. What is your position within your organization?
  Response Percent Response Total
    President / Chairman
27.1% 19
    Vice President / Vice Chairman
5.7% 4
    Secretary
2.9% 2
    Treasurer
37.1% 26
    SAC representative
5.7% 4
    Committee member
4.3% 3
    Active member of the group
7.1% 5
    Other (please specify)
10% 7
Total Respondents   70
(skipped this question)   0
2. How many times have you met with the SAC Executive commitee since January 2002?
  Response Percent Response Total
    0
57.1% 40
    1
28.6% 20
    2
7.1% 5
    3
4.3% 3
    4
1.4% 1
    5 or more
1.4% 1
Total Respondents   70
(skipped this question)   0
3. How many times have you attended a SAC General Body meeting since January 2002?
  Response Percent Response Total
    0
17.1% 12
    1
10% 7
    2
32.9% 23
    3
21.4% 15
    4
5.7% 4
    5 or more
12.9% 9
Total Respondents   70
(skipped this question)   0
4. Approximately how many active members does your group have? If you don't know, just type n/a.
 Total Respondents  
68
(skipped this question)   2
5. Does your group receive funding from SAC?
  Response Percent Response Total
    Yes
82.9% 58
    No
11.4% 8
    Unsure
5.7% 4
Total Respondents   70
(skipped this question)   0
6. Is your group currently recognized by SAC? ie. you are not currently on our de-recognized list.
  Response Percent Response Total
    Yes
97.1% 68
    No
2.9% 2
    Unsure
0% 0
Total Respondents   70
(skipped this question)   0
7. How would you rate the members of SAC Exec in regard to the following characteristics?
Not at all Somewhat Very N/A Response Average
Approachability
2% (1) 33% (21) 40% (25) 25% (16) 2.51
Efficiency
3% (2) 32% (20) 46% (29) 19% (12) 2.53
Responsiveness
3% (2) 33% (21) 43% (27) 21% (13) 2.50
Total Respondents   63
(skipped this question)   7
8. In answering the question above, do you believe there is a large variance in member characteristics. ie. it was difficult to generalize in the question above.
  Response Percent Response Total
    Yes
30.6% 19
    No
29% 18
    Unsure
40.3% 25
Total Respondents   62
(skipped this question)   8
9. How would rate SAC Exec's decisions/recommendations in regard to the following attributes?
Poor Satisfactory Good Excellent N/A Response Average
Fairness
6% (4) 24% (15) 38% (24) 22% (14) 10% (6) 2.84
Diplomacy
3% (2) 21% (13) 40% (25) 29% (18) 8% (5) 3.02
Effectiveness
2% (1) 27% (17) 42% (26) 21% (13) 8% (5) 2.89
Total Respondents   63
(skipped this question)   7
10. Why do you think new student groups apply to join SAC? Specify all that apply.
  Response Percent Response Total
  A) Funding
98.4% 62
  B) Status of affiliation
47.6% 30
  C) Access to facilities (eg free dolphin accounts, space reservations etc)
74.6% 47
  D) None of the above
  0% 0
Total Respondents   63
(skipped this question)   7
11. Overall, how do your "perceptions" of SAC Exec differ from your "actual" experience with them?
  Response Percent Response Total
    Not much
25.4% 15
    Somewhat
23.7% 14
    Greatly
6.8% 4
    Unsure
27.1% 16
    Not applicable
16.9% 10
Total Respondents   59
(skipped this question)   10
12. How effective do you think this idea was?
  Response Percent Response Total
    A waste of time
17.7% 11
    Handy and somewhat useful
45.2% 28
    An awesome idea that helps me remember meetings and enforces SAC's new image
27.4% 17
    Not applicable
9.7% 6
Total Respondents   62
(skipped this question)   8
13. How would you rate the SAC website based on the following criteria?
Poor Satisfactory Good Excellent N/A Response Average
Appearance / attractiveness
2% (1) 6% (4) 29% (18) 56% (35) 6% (4) 3.50
General usefulness
0% (0) 11% (7) 50% (31) 32% (20) 6% (4) 3.22
Quality of information
2% (1) 11% (7) 41% (25) 39% (24) 7% (4) 3.26
Ease of use / navigation
5% (3) 15% (9) 40% (25) 34% (21) 6% (4) 3.10
Total Respondents   62
(skipped this question)   8
14. Building off the website, would you find it beneficial if SAC were to expand and launch a marketing campaign in order to promote activities on campus. For example, posters highlighting different types of groups and messages encouraging people to get involved? ... a general campaign that attempts to build Univ. spirit and get people involved in the many activities on campus.
  Response Percent Response Total
    Yes
70.5% 43
    No
19.7% 12
    Unsure
9.8% 6
Total Respondents   61
(skipped this question)   9
15. If your answer to the above question was "yes," how much would you be willing to grant for such a campaign? (funds would be drawn from the SAC administrative account)
  Response Percent Response Total
    $100-$500
19.6% 11
    $500-$1000
28.6% 16
    $1000-$2500
12.5% 7
    $2500-$5000
10.7% 6
    $5000 and greater
1.8% 1
    Not applicable
26.8% 15
Total Respondents   56
(skipped this question)   14
16. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the OVERALL performance of SAC Exec over the past few months (since August 2002)?
  Response Percent Response Total
    1 :-( Shocking !!
0% 0
    2
0% 0
    3
1.7% 1
    4
0% 0
    5 :-| OK, I suppose
15.5% 9
    6
10.3% 6
    7
34.5% 20
    8
24.1% 14
    9
6.9% 4
    10 :-) Excellent, Bravo !!
6.9% 4
Total Respondents   58
(skipped this question)   12
17. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the OVERALL performance of YOUR group over the past few months (since August 2002)?
  Response Percent Response Total
    1 :-( Poor
1.7% 1
    2
0% 0
    3
1.7% 1
    4
0% 0
    5 :-| Average
10.3% 6
    6
10.3% 6
    7
20.7% 12
    8
22.4% 13
    9
22.4% 13
    10 :-) Excellent
10.3% 6
Total Respondents   58
(skipped this question)   12
18. Would you ever run for election to the SAC Exec board?
  Response Percent Response Total
    Yes
15.3% 9
    Unsure
25.4% 15
    No. Please give a reason/word as to why. (ie. not interested, time constraints, other etc..)
59.3% 35
Total Respondents   59
(skipped this question)   11
end // < back home